Someone's going to slam me as some kind of neo-con for this, but here goes. A few days back there was a reel posted on FB with a message that went something like: "If you aren't hearing about Cornell this week in worship... or ICE, the never-ending war in Iran, the various levels of pain this war is causing to Iranian civilians, US soldiers, or those of us on limited budgets in the US... there's something wrong with your church or its pastor because what good is faith if it isn't healing the wounds of the world?" That's not an exact quote, mind you, just what I can recall.
Most of the time when rhetorical bromides appear on FB, I sit in silence for a spell. I suspect that I am as distressed by our cultural and political disintegration as the presenter. I just choose to give my energy, attention, resources, and prayers to people and events I can do something about. I sometimes share a check with a relief organization that's far away - most recently to Palestine - but only periodically. As noted elsewhere, I strive to practice the "10-Foot Rule" of solidarity. Or, as Pete Seeger used to say: "Think globally and act locally." Not only is connecting with people close by a strategy that strikes me as more effective than either/or diatribes, it also diminishes some of the cultural fallout that's been created when elitist and privileged souls whine in public about problems beyond their control.
Is that too harsh? Let me explain: I've forgotten who first observed the phenomenon of confusing carping out loud with meaningful social and spiritual transformation, but it's become epidemic among 21st century liberals and conservatives alike. I don't know if it started with mistaking reading for knowledge - or equating words and ideas with embodied revelation - but it's become a social disease with dangerous consequences that has only been exacerbated by the flood of selective "information" we consume on the Internet, the triumph of a zero sum transactional economy, and the denigration of awe and wonder in popular and academic culture. Without a training in complex, critical thought and the capacity to experience mystery, everything from religion, politics and culture becomes an either/or, win/lose proposition. Such obfuscation has caused polarities to vanish, nuance to be erased from consideration, and paradox to be discarded into the dustbin of history.
That is how I understand the rise of religious fundamentalism. It's a quest for security not truth in an era of anxiety. So, too, its bastard child: Christian Nationalism. Both "isms" work overtime to give greed, jingoism, sexism, white supremacy, homophobia, and moral hypocrisy a sacred pass. Shamelessly cherry picking Biblical texts taken out of context, the proponents of such spiritual security simultaneously scapegoat their critics while feeding the flocks with fear, fury, and shame. Kate Lore's poem, "Call Back the Holy" amplifies this:
A god who needs cruel men
to bruise the world into obedience
is a god cruel men have made—
shaped from their fear,
crowned with their hunger,
given a voice
that echoes only themselves.
Leave that altar. Come into the open,
where the Holy is still breathing
in leaf and lung,
still rising like dawn
beyond every border
drawn by fear.
God is the open hand,
the widening doorway,
the lamp left burning
to guide the lost home.
God kneels beside the wounded,
breaks bread with the stranger,
and gathers the banished
into the wide embrace
of belonging.
Let the gods of cruelty
crumble into dust.
Let Love rise instead—ancient as breath, gentle as mercy,
strong as the river
breaking winter’s hold.
Let Love rise in us
until every soul is gathered
within the circle of our care.
For God is Love. And Love asks only
that we become
its open hands.
One of the reasons I believe these heresies are thriving, and all too often considered to be normative in the US, is that those holding more generous or compassionate visions of creation are almost as Biblically illiterate as their opponents. Our addiction to binary thinking, you know, is not the sole property of conservatives. Adding insult to injury is yet another unintended consequence of a post-modern bigotry that is saturated in a simple-minded secularism: the obliteration of our historic reservoir of shared stories, myths, and songs. I'm all for expanding the canon of great literature, but why throw the baby out with the bath water? That's what my Protestant kin did with the sacred mysticism and contemplative practices of our Christian origins that are only now being reclaimed. Such intellectual and spiritual paucity now means we live, speak, think, shop, and engage the world primarily from within our respective siloes, denigrating outsiders who dwell beyond our gated communities, political parties, spiritualities, and ideologies, with a toxic disdain. This observation, of course, is not new: sociologist Robert Putnam pondered it in Bowling Alone in 2020, Neil Postman offered a similar analysis in Amusing Ourselves to Death in 1985, Charles Taylor's magnum opus, Secularism, cut deep in 2007, as did the dystopian works of Margaret Atwood, Aldous Huxley, and George Orwell.
I suppose the catalyst of this essay began after hearing a recently aired radio program produced by New England Public Media's, Michelle Harven, for 1A entitled: If You Can Keep It: Mental Health and Democracy. (check it out here and listen @ https://the1a.org/person/michelle-harven/) The presenting proposition was clear: Since the January 6th attempted coup, Americans have been living through an era of social trauma (with trauma defined as an unsettling experience that has not been given enough time to be digested, grieved, and integrated into our lives.) All of us, regardless of our politics, have been unable to re-ground ourselves in stability and community. Consequently, anxiety rather than trust rules the day which leads me back to my opening frustration with the liberal Christian either/or meme. This moment in our combined history requires more compassion not more either/or religion that demonizes our neighbors. Now is the time to learn to listen to one another with a new commitment to the common good. And that can't happen without time, patience, a willingness to go slowly, and genuinely get over ourselves long enough to hear another's story.
Liberals, I submit to you, are frantic because we've lost the privilege of influencing and shaping our culture. With rare exceptions, rather than grieve like adults, we've taken the path of cheap grace by carping like spoiled children who mistake noise for meaningful solutions. Since WWII, working class conservatives who have lost their economic standing now believe the promise of the American Dream is an impossibility. They have been caught up in a politics of "gotcha" that blames the liberation movement of the past 50 years for their diminished status; when, in fact, globalism, greed, and deindustrialization are the true culprits. Whether it is realistic to create new alliances between these factions through careful listening and discovering common ground is unclear.
What is clear, however, is that there's a place true religious pluralism - especially for those who yearn to do what we've always done best: create safe centers for solace and compassion. Without a doubt, social analysis and transformation are integral to healing an infected body politic. And religious people should have a place at the tables where change is being discussed, planned, and protested. But that is not our ONLY role. For at the heart of true religion is a shared tenderness. A hunger for right relationships. A sacrificial trust that builds community. I don't know how many times I have had to point out that the symbol of Jesus over-turning the money changers tables in the Jerusalem Temple with a whip and righteous anger is powerful - but it happened only once - and is not normative. Rather, healing, listening, solidarity, time-tested wisdom, and spiritual practices are what is at the core of our tradition. Like the Taizé community of France likes to say: we are a festival of possibilities, not the complete solution to the wounds of the world. We prefiguratively incarnate alternatives to a status quo that is worn out and in its death throes. None of us needs more hyperbole or crude anger. Yes, there will likely be times when we must put our bodies on the line for another. But what is more come - and needed, too - are reminders like this poem ascribed to Mother Teresa that was written on the wall of her children's home in Calcutta.
Do It Anyway
People are often unreasonable, illogical, and self-centered;
forgive them anyway.
If you do good, people may accuse you of selfish, ulterior motives;
do good anyway.
If you are successful, you will win some false friends and some true enemies; succeed anyway.
Honesty and frankness make you vulnerable;
be honest and frank anyway.
What you spend years building, someone could destroy overnight;
build anyway.
If you find serenity and happiness, there may be jealousy;
be happy anyway.
The good you do today, people will often forget tomorrow;
do good anyway.
Give the world the best you have, and it may never be enough;
give the world the best you’ve got anyway.
You see, in the final analysis, it is between you and God;
it was never between you and them anyway.