These Celts had a deep understanding that walking embodies prayer, and walking in a circle has a way of moving our brains out of their desired linear course. When we are discerning our direction in life, we often want the next best step to appear, if not the entire path clearly ahead. But discernment in this tradition is more like a spiraling inward and a deep attentiveness to what is happening in the moment.
Like Taylor, Brooks, Martian, the Pope (old and new), those writing from a spiritual but not religious perspective, feminist authors, hundreds of musicians, and their countless popular songs, I, too, began to see that while human angst, confusion, and inner fury are a part of the human condition, they aren't the whole story. It's clear that some of us have been blinded by our culture's obsession with unbridled individualism. Others have endured the starvation of their souls in societies built upon a one-size-fits-all bureaucratic collectivism. Some have been wounded by religion, others have been kept ignorant of or afraid of its blessings, and still others who found their hearts, minds, and flesh set free by the promises of faith. Small wonder that brother Brooks believes that perhaps NOW is the time for a Maritain revival
The first responsibility of personalism is to see each other person in his orher full depth. This is astonishingly hard to do. As we go through our busy days, it’s normal to want to establish I-It relationships — with the security guard in your building or the office worker down the hall. Life is busy, and sometimes we just need to reduce people to their superficial function." But personalism asks, as much as possible, for I-Thou encounters: that you just don’t regard people as a data point, but as emerging out of the full narrative, and that you try, when you can, to get to know their stories, or at least to realize that everybody is in a struggle you know nothing about.
Jazz critic extraordinaire and public intellectual, Ted Goia, also brings something to the table of synchronicity in his recent explication of the "new romanticism" that is rumbling just below the surface of popular culture. As one often labeled "a total downer," Goia replies that he's more of a truth teller in a culture of denial. He is savvy, sassy, and seriously attuned to the wisdom beyond the obvious in popular culture. (check out his Substack column @ The Honest Broker.) Take a careful look at this reflection on the emerging rebellion against life ruled by algorithms In the 1800s, cultural elites assumed that technology, science, the pursuit of profits, and linear reason would unlock an earthly paradise.
“Imagine a growing sense that algorithmic and mechanistic thinking has become too oppressive. Imagine if people started resisting technology. Imagine a revolt against STEM’s dominance. Imagine people deciding that the good life starts with NOT learning how to code.”
This rings true to me personally, professionally, and politically. It seems to be true on the edges of culture, too. Goia observes that stepping back from the overly optimistic promises of rationalism includes relinquishing our " aesthetics of light" for an "aesthetics of dark." More mysticism than map-making. More trusting the slender strands of synchronicity than the propaganda of Meta and X. He writes:
"When rationalistic and algorithmic tyranny grows too extreme, art returns to the darkness of the unconscious life—and perhaps of the womb." His closing insights speak to my heart as this personal pilgrimage ripens:
Beethoven turned against Napoleon—and this is emblematic of the aesthetic reversal sweeping through Europe (during the first age of romanticism). Not long ago, Beethoven and other artists looked to French rationalism as a harbinger of a new age of freedom and individual flourishing. But this entire progress-obsessed ideology is unraveling. It’s somehow fitting that music takes the lead role in deconstructing a tyrannical rationalism, and proposing a more human alternative.
Could that happen again? Imagine a growing sense that algorithmic and mechanistic thinking has become too oppressive. Imagine if people started resisting technology as a malicious form of control, and not a pathway to liberation, empowerment, and human flourishing—soul-nurturing riches that must come from someplace deeper. Imagine a revolt against STEM’s dominance and dictatorship over all other fields? Imagine people deciding that the good life starts with NOT learning how to code. If that happened now, wouldn’t music stand out as the pathway? What could possibly be more opposed to brutal rationalism running out of control than a song?
Personalism is all about availability: to be open for this kind of giving and friendship. This is a tough one, too; life is busy, and being available for people takes time and intentionality. Margarita Mooney of Princeton Theological Seminary has written that personalism is a middle way between authoritarian collectivism and radical individualism. The former subsumes the individual within the collective. The latter uses the group to serve the interests of the self. Personalism demands that we change the way we structure our institutions. A company that treats people as units to simply maximize shareholder return is showing contempt for its own workers. Schools that treat students as brains on a stick are not preparing them to lead whole lives. The big point is that today’s social fragmentation didn’t spring from shallow roots. It sprang from worldviews that amputated people from their own depths and divided them into simplistic, flattened identities. That has to change. As Charles PĆ©guy said, “The revolution is moral or not at all.


















