In doing this the mystery of the Sacred came to be described as Holy Trinity - three in one and one in three - or Father, Son and Holy Spirit. There is both precision and imagination in this expression - depth and even playfulness, too. And while there is much more that could be said about God as Trinity - and often should be articulated, too - this poetic interpretation always points to a deep relational truth that lives beyond the limits of language. Such poetry was never meant to be calcified - although that has happened - but rather was to be evocative in ways that opened the heart and soul of people to the blessings of the Lord that are experiential but never fully comprehended.
It is my contention that contemporary problems with theological language are rarely just the fault of our earliest imaginative poets. To be sure, these first century thinkers had as many blind spots and disconnects as do we in the 21st century. But that is up to each contemporary era to understand and correct - to reform and remain reforming - throughout the ages. Without this, the upside down values of God are buried under fear, rules and habit. Small wonder, as Phyliss Trickle and Diana Bass have noted, that the church seems to need a profound revolution every 500 years in order to reclaim the creativity of our poetry from the confines of tradition.
Which brings me back to the word sin - and all of the baggage it carries. The poet John Berryman wrote: every generation is unwell in a new way. Eugene Peterson goes on to note that one of the ways our generation is unwell has something to do with having "little consciousness of being a part of a community that carries in its Scriptures, its worship and its forms of obedience a life twenty and more centuries in the making." (Contemplative Pastor, p. 126) That is, not only are we certain that everything we are experiencing in life is totally unique, but that none of the old words apply or work. Like Chrissy Hynde of The Pretenders sings: I'm special...oh so special!
But that's only part of the truth: we are simultaneously made not only a little lower than the angels (Psalm 8:5) but also dust and ash to which we will return (Genesis 3:19) Indeed, there is nothing new under the sun as the wise old trouble-making preacher of Ecclesiastes observes. "What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun." Peterson pushes the implications of this further noting that people who are certain they are special:
... are subject to consistent trivialization. They find it impossible to tell what may be important. They buy things, both material and spiritual, that they will never use. They hear the same lies over and over again without ever becoming angry. They are led to entertain, and for brief times, practice, all kinds of religious commitment from magazine moralisms to occultic seances. In none of it do they show any particular perseverance. But neither do they show much sign of wising up - of developing a historical sense - of becoming conscious that they are part of a continuing people of God and growing beyond adolescent susceptibilities to novelty and fantasy. (p. 126)
That is why in the past 10 years I have found myself returning again to the old words of tradition like sin to describe part of the human condition. I have to wrestle with them in my context - and sometimes point out their inadequacies as poetic simulacrum - but also own the fact that rarely are there better alternatives. These words are time-tested and work reasonably well when given careful and compassionate contextualization.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8ab1/a8ab1ee2e03acf14d9d3963e646363f9569038de" alt=""
Like Rabbi Harold Kushner once said about the traditional words of his tradition: they are time-tested, dragged through the sands of history until all the dross has been worn off. His context was being in community and rewriting the words of the Yom Kippur liturgy. The first year they did this, the new words were fresh and exciting. In year two, the new words were mostly ok but seemed a bit dated. And by year three they were stale and one dimensional. So the community chose to reclaim the ancient words because they had poetry, nuance and depth. We've done much the same thing in our Sunday morning liturgy: we use new and old versions of the Lord's Prayer, the Doxology and other traditional expressions. Sometimes the old ways just work better - not always - but when they do we should honor them and use them wisely.
So I wrestle with sin - and use it alongside some of the contemporary alternatives like brokenness and alienation. Fr. Keating of centering prayer fame speaks about sin as "our false self" and that has resonance, too. Those who work in faith communities must be tender and clear because this tiny word has done such great damage. And perhaps that is its power: it can both unlock shame and guilt and bind it, too. It can set the captive free or damn her to a life of hell.
I suspect that throughout time people of faith have wrestled with the double edged sword of this word - and it was no more acceptable or comprehensible by society in Paul's time as it is in ours. After all, he spoke of the Cross as being "foolish to those who are perishing but to those who are being made whole it is the very word of God." (I Corinthians 1:18)
For Jews demand signs and Greeks desire wisdom, but we proclaim Christ crucified, a stumbling-block to Jews and foolishness to Gentiles,but to those who are the called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God. For God’s foolishness is wiser than human wisdom, and God’s weakness is stronger than human strength.
I think Peterson's contemporary reworking works well, too: While Jews clamor for miraculous demonstrations and Greeks go in for philosophical wisdom, we go right on proclaiming Christ, the Crucified. Jews treat this like an anti-miracle—and Greeks pass it off as absurd. But to us who are personally called by God himself—both Jews and Greeks—Christ is God’s ultimate miracle and wisdom all wrapped up in one. Human wisdom is so tinny, so impotent, next to the seeming absurdity of God. Human strength can’t begin to compete with God’s “weakness.”
With all sorts of qualifications and explanations, I continue to find that many of the old words work better than almost all the new alternatives. So I am curious to know your take on all of this: drop me a note when you can.
credits:
1) www.keithsrevolution.com
2) www.triarchypress.com
3) www.dreamstime.com